Comments on: quebec police admit going undercover at montebello protests

By: melodiccreepingdeath

melodiccreepingdeath — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

protesters need …
protesters need guns, they make more of a “boom” theyll get ur message!

By: Sojaofdapepo

Sojaofdapepo — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

lmao at her last …
lmao at her last name lol

By: Frettsy

Frettsy — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

“refused to throw …
“refused to throw stones”.. but almost did!

By: StephenMaturinMD

StephenMaturinMD — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

Utter nonsense! …
Utter nonsense! There is no justification for these so-called men to be armed and apparently willing to use violence. If there are undercover police in the crowd, they should be totally passive until action is called for by events, not likely to create events by their criminal behaviour. I was a cop, so I reckon I know a bit about these situations.

By: Voltara

Voltara — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

Somebody did pull …
Somebody did pull at their masks, and one came right down.
The police are lying. The undercover cops were deliberately causing trouble and behaving aggressively. Their actions cannot be justified on any grounds and their unwillingness to deal with the issue in a reasonable manner proves they are acting against the best interests of the public they are supposed to protect

By: scottmck72

scottmck72 — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

What a beat up. …
What a beat up. It’s standard police practice all over the world for undercover officers to infiltrate those elements of a protest/riot that present a threat of violence. The aim is to identify and arrest violent agitators. Of course, in doing so they have to dress like and APPEAR to behave like the agitators. Did they actually do anything illegal? No. If anarchists hijacked the protest you would thank those cops for being in there.

By: StephenMaturinMD

StephenMaturinMD — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

Why didn’t someone …
Why didn’t someone pull off their masks?
They were only bandanas, surely not too difficult. Terrible case of criminal police actions.

By: LilahKnight

LilahKnight — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

What’s more, …
What’s more, Stockwell Day (the man who spoke last in this vid) is the one who is responsible for the cops who were ordered to incite violence at the peaceful protest, so going to him for answers isn’t exactly going to do any good!

By: LilahKnight

LilahKnight — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

If they were there …
If they were there to maintain order and security, WHY WERE THEY PUSHING A PEACEFUL OLD MAN AROUND? EH? and waving ROCKS in the air? Obviously they are lying, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out. How the do our politicians get away with this. It’s such an in-your-face lie, it’s not even an underhanded one, I just have to “lol”.

By: momentinpassing

momentinpassing — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:15:21 +0000

No mention of the …
No mention of the fact that Quebec police LIED about this incident first. No naming of the three instigators. No challenge of the absurd claims (that’s polite-speak for lies) in light of the man holding a weapon. CBC for the lose.